![]() Fieldwork for this inspection took place in August 2022.HM Inspectorate of Probation is the independent inspector of youth offending and probation services across England and Wales.The report is available on the HM Inspectorate of Probation website on 03 November 2022 00.01.It also rated the quality of resettlement work as ‘Outstanding’. For encrypted email support, email us at our ProtonMail address using your ProtonMail account. The inspection looked at standards of organisational delivery (leadership, staffing and facilities), their management of children serving court sentences (court disposals) and children serving cautions or community sentences (out-of-court disposals). For general questions, or if youd like to just say hello, please email us at.The Inspectorate uses a four-point scale: ‘Outstanding’, ‘Good’, ‘Requires improvement’ and ‘Inadequate’, rating specific aspects of each service and giving an overall rating.Youth offending services work with children aged 10 to 17 and supervise children with complex needs and some in the care of the local authority.This inspection report makes nine recommendations, for an improvement programme for this service. The report acknowledges that the service supervises a number of children with trauma and damaging life experiences, but the complex needs of the children are not being addressed through the work being delivered, despite the service’s ambitions and intentions. The court replaced it with a standard developed by the American Law Institute: A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct. In contrast, we found that out-of-court disposal work – where children are diverted from the criminal justice system – was disappointing. Summary - complete - notes which summarise the entirety of year 1 dentistry Moral Panic Notes - Brief summary of theory and criticism. ![]() The quality of resettlement work – plans to ensure children have accommodation and other services – was rated separately as ‘Outstanding’. ![]() Good quality work was evident in cases where children are leaving custody. This inspection found that both managers and youth justice workers are experienced and knowledgeable, but that there is a lack of scrutiny and challenge, by the management board, to ensure that a high level of work is being delivered. We know the service is committed to making improvements and we look forward to watching them develop.” On too many occasions we found issues of risk to a child’s safety and wellbeing, or the risk of harm they may present to other people, were not being given enough attention.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |